Assessment of Miscible Injection into a Basin Field in Kazakhstan: A Comparative Study of Hydrocarbon Gases, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide

Authors

  • Bolatbek Khusain D.V. Sokolsky Institute of Fuel, Catalysis and Electrochemistry, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
  • Alexandr Logvinenko Kazakh Institute of Oil and Gas, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Abzal Kenessary Kazakh Institute of Oil and Gas, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Ranida Tyulebayeva Kazakh Institute of Oil and Gas, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Jamilyam Ismailova Satbayev University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Dinara Delikesheva Satbayev University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 25677-25687 | August 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9826

Abstract

This research investigated the miscible gas injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in a carbonate reservoir in Kazakhstan. Five mixtures, each containing varying percentages of methane, ethane, propane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen, were studied to determine their Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) values through PVTi and slim tube tests. Among them, mixtures #2 (CH4 and C3H8) and #4 (pure CO2) exhibited the best performance, with mixture #2 achieving the lowest MMP value, while CO2 showed the best miscibility at lower pressures and the option of potential carbon sequestration. Most of the results were supported by slim tube experiments, compositional simulations (Eclipse), and phase behavior analysis using Gibbs triangles and ternary diagrams. The study contributed to the EOR research by incorporating multi-component gas evaluation and advanced phase visualization, thereby filling the gaps by previous works focused on single gases. The key findings emphasized the need to balance the technical efficiency, environmental sustainability, and operational viability in gas selection, providing critical insights for optimizing the EOR strategies in similar reservoirs.

Keywords:

carbon dioxide, phase diagram, minimum miscibility pressure, PVT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. M. Mansour, A. M. Al-Sabagh, S. M. Desouky, F. M. Zawawy, and M. Ramzi, "A new estimating method of minimum miscibility pressure as a key parameter in designing CO2 gas injection process," Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 801–810, Dec. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.12.002

E. A. Chukwudeme and A. A. Hamouda, "Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils," Energies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 714–737, Sep. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en20300714

S. Chandra, P. A. Aziz, M. R. Naufal, and W. N. Daton, "Well Integrity Study for CO2 WAG Application in Mature Field X, South Sumatra Area for the Fulfillment as CO2 Sequestration Sink," Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 107–121, Aug. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.44.2.587

V. S. Rios, L. O. S. Santos, F. B. Quadros, and D. J. Schiozer, "New upscaling technique for compositional reservoir simulations of miscible gas injection," Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 175, pp. 389–406, Apr. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.061

H. Hao, J. Hou, F. Zhao, H. Huang, and H. Liu, "N2 -foam-assisted CO2 huff-n-puff process for enhanced oil recovery in a heterogeneous edge-water reservoir: experiments and pilot tests," RSC Advances, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1134–1146, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA09448J

M. A. Khashman and H. Shirazi, "3D Geological Modeling with Petrel Software: Estimating Original Oil in Place of Lower Cretaceous Y- Formation: A Case Study in a Selected Oilfield." Sep. 25, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3345863/v1

A. A. Hamouda and S. Chughtai, "Miscible CO2 Flooding for EOR in the Presence of Natural Gas Components in Displacing and Displaced Fluids," Energies, vol. 11, no. 2, Feb. 2018, Art. no. 391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020391

L. W. Lake, Enhanced Oil Recovery. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1989.

M. Abdurrahman et al., "Minimum CO2 Miscibility Pressure Evaluation using Interfacial Tension (IFT) and Slim-tube Hybrid Tests," ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 8703–8711, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08085

L. Yang, W. Rui, Z. Qingmin, Z. Yuanlong, F. Xin, and X. Zhaojie, "CO2-enhanced oil recovery with CO2 utilization and storage: Progress and practical applications in China," Unconventional Resources, vol. 4, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 100096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uncres.2024.100096

J. J. Sheng, "Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection," Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 252–259, Jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.12.002

M. Ding, M. Gao, Y. Wang, Z. Qu, and X. Chen, "Experimental study on CO2-EOR in fractured reservoirs: Influence of fracture density, miscibility and production scheme," Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 174, pp. 476–485, Mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.039

S. Sakthivel, A. Adebayo, and M. Y. Kanj, "Experimental Evaluation of Carbon Dots Stabilized Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energy & Fuels, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 9629–9643, Oct. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02235

F. Guo and S. Aryana, "An experimental investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam used in enhanced oil recovery," Fuel, vol. 186, pp. 430–442, Dec. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.058

X. Zhou, Q. Yuan, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, F. Zeng, and L. Zhang, "Performance evaluation of CO2 flooding process in tight oil reservoir via experimental and numerical simulation studies," Fuel, vol. 236, pp. 730–746, Jan. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.035

Y. Su et al., "The Influence of Slim Tube Length on the Minimum Miscibility Pressure of CO2 Gas–Crude Oil," Processes, vol. 12, no. 4, Apr. 2024, Art. no. 650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040650

N. Badrouchi, H. Pu, S. Smith, and F. Badrouchi, "Evaluation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in unconventional reservoirs: Experimental parametric study in the Bakken," Fuel, vol. 312, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 122941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122941

M. Hussain, F. Boukadi, Z. Hu, and D. Adjei, "Optimizing Oil Recovery: A Sector Model Study of CO₂-Water-Alternating-Gas and Continuous Injection Technologies," Processes, vol. 13, no. 3, Mar. 2025, Art. no. 700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030700

B. Liu, J. Yao, and T. Sun, "Numerical analysis of water-alternating-CO2 flooding for CO2-EOR and storage projects in residual oil zones," International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, Nov. 2023, Art. no. 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-023-00647-9

L. Fan, J. Chen, J. Zhu, X. Nie, B. Li, and Z. Shi, "Experimental Study on Enhanced Shale Oil Recovery and Remaining Oil Distribution by CO2 Flooding with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology," Energy & Fuels, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1973–1985, Feb. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02982

M. M. A. Awan and F. U. D. Kirmani, "CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery: Analyzing the effect of injection rate and bottom hole pressure," Petroleum Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 129–136, Mar. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2024.08.006

K. K. Ihekoronye, A. D. I. Sulaiman, M. B. Adamu, H. Usman, R. Z. Milton, and C. A. Ibrahim, "3-D Modelling and Simulation of a Reservoir for Surfactant-Polymer Flooding Using Eclipse Software," Petroleum & Coal, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 691–701, 2024.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
B. Khusain, A. Logvinenko, A. Kenessary, R. Tyulebayeva, J. Ismailova, and D. Delikesheva, “Assessment of Miscible Injection into a Basin Field in Kazakhstan: A Comparative Study of Hydrocarbon Gases, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25677–25687, Aug. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 111
PDF Downloads: 302

Metrics Information