Predicting the Time Impact and Identifying the Practical Responses to Claim Causes in Building Projects

Authors

  • Sang Quang Van Center of Digital Asset Management for Sustainable Development (CDAM), Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1020-1971
  • Veerasak Likhitruangsilp Center of Digital Asset Management for Sustainable Development (CDAM), Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
  • Photios G. Ioannou Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 27257-27265 | October 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.12541

Abstract

Construction claims are inevitable and usually result in negative impacts on the project performance, and especially the project delays. This study aims to predict the time impacts and identify the practical responses to claim causes in building projects. Firstly, potential claim causes were identified through an extensive literature review and verified by a group of nine claim experts. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with these experts to establish the causal relationships among the identified claim causes. These relationships were then used to structure a  Bayesian Network (BN) model for predicting the time impacts of each claim cause. The BN model comprised 13 claim causes of which only one claim cause (i.e. change orders) was independent. Subsequently, the historical data on the claim causes were collected from 112 actual building projects via a structured questionnaire survey. The data were then encoded and used as input to the model. A real case study project was used to demonstrate the predictive capability of the model. The results showed that the BN model is capable of effectively predicting the time impact levels of the claim causes. Next, twelve claim experts were invited to identify response strategies for each claim cause. It was found that the five response strategies commonly adopted for addressing claim causes are the: acceptance, avoidance, mitigation, contingency plan/reserve, and transfer. The present study also identified practical response methods for dealing with such claim causes. This study contributes a practical approach for forecasting the potential time impacts of the claim causes and formulating practical responses, thereby enhancing the claim management practices in building projects.

Keywords:

claim causes, Bayesian Network, time impacts, predict, response strategies, response methods

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Wang, I. Harsono, C.-J. Shieh, V. Samusenkov, and S. Shoar, "Identification of critical paths leading to cost claims for underground metro projects: a system dynamics approach," Kybernetes, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1861–1878, May 2023.

A. A. Olanrewaju and P. J. Anavhe, "Perceived claim sources in the Nigerian construction industry," Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 281–295, Jul. 2014.

S. H. Khahro and T. H. Ali, "Causes leading to conflicts in construction projects: A viewpoint of Pakistani construction industry," in International Conference on challenges in IT, Engineering and Technology, Phuket, Thailand, 2014, pp. 116–121.

B. Apte and S. Pathak, "Review of Types and Causes of Construction Claims," International Journal of Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Design, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43–50, 2016.

P. Sakate and A. Dhawale, "Analysis of Claims and Dispute in Construction Industry," International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 523–535 May 2017.

S.-O. Cheung, S. T. Ng, K.-C. Lam, and W.-S. Sin, "A fuzzy sets model for construction dispute evaluation," Construction Innovation, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 117–127, Jun. 2001.

S. O. Cheung and K. H. Y. Pang, "Anatomy of Construction Disputes," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 15–23, Jan. 2013.

Global construction disputes report 2018: Does the construction industry learn from its mistakes. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Arcadis, 2018.

W. Shen et al., "Causes of contractors’ claims in international engineering-procurement-construction projects," Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 727–739, Jun. 2017.

M. Mishmish and S. M. El-Sayegh, "Causes of claims in road construction projects in the UAE," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 26–33, Jan. 2018.

S. Assaf, M. A. Hassanain, A. Abdallah, A. M. Z. Sayed, and A. Alshahrani, "Significant causes of claims and disputes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia," Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 597–615, Nov. 2019.

M. Parchami Jalal, E. Noorzai, and T. Yavari Roushan, "Root Cause Analysis of the Most Frequent Claims in the Building Industry through the SCoP3 E Ishikawa Diagram," Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, vol. 11, no. 2, May 2019, Art. no. 04519004.

P. M. Silva, N. Domingo, and N. A. N. Ameer Ali, "Causes of disputes in the construction industry – a systematic literature review," Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 193–210, Jun. 2024.

M. Shojaat, H. Malekitabar, and H. Haghayegh Isfahani, "Navigating the Complexity of Dispute Management in Construction: A DEMATEL and Bayesian Network Approach," Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, vol. 17, no. 1, Feb. 2025, Art. no. 04524029.

F. Nasirzadeh, D. G. Carmichael, M. J. Jarban, and M. Rostamnezhad, "Hybrid fuzzy-system dynamics approach for quantification of the impacts of construction claims," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1261–1276, Aug. 2019.

Y. M. Al Malki and M. S. Alam, "Construction claims, their types and causes in the private construction industry in the Kingdom of Bahrain," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 477–484, Apr. 2021.

J. Wang, S. Zhang, R. Jin, P. Fenn, D. Yu, and L. Zhao, "Identifying Critical Dispute Causes in the Construction Industry: A Cross-Regional Comparative Study between China and the UK," Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 39, no. 2, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 04022072.

E. Pouyanrad and M. Parchamijalal, "Analysis of Claims Related to the Employer’s Project Manager in Construction Projects," Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, vol. 17, no. 1, Feb. 2025, Art. no. 04524035.

E. K. Zaneldin, "Investigating the types, causes and severity of claims in construction projects in the UAE," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 385–401, Sep. 2020.

S. T. Do, V. T. Nguyen, C. N. N. Tran, and Z. M. Aung, "Identifying and evaluating the key claim causes leading to construction delays," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1999–2011, Sep. 2023.

V. Likhitruangsilp, P. G. Ioannou, and S. Q. Van, "Analyzing the Interdependences of Claim Causes in Construction Projects," Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, vol. 9, no. 1, Jul. 2022, Art. no. LDR-01.

L. Le-Hoai, C. N. Dang, S. B. Lee, and Y. D. Lee, "Benchmarking claim causes against contractors in emerging markets: empirical case study," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 307–316, Jul. 2019.

V. T. Nguyen, S. T. Do, C. N. N. Tran, and Z. M. Aung, "Developing a Bayesian belief network model for quantifying and predicting claim causes-related schedule delays," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 32–45, Jan. 2025.

O. Hashim Motaleb and M. Kishk, "Assessing risk response maturity: A framework for construction projects success in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 247–262, Apr. 2014.

J. Cheng, R. Greiner, J. Kelly, D. Bell, and W. Liu, "Learning Bayesian networks from data: An information-theory based approach," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 137, no. 1–2, pp. 43–90, May 2002.

M. Mohamad and D. Q. Tran, "Risk-Based Prioritization Approach to Construction Inspections for Transportation Projects," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 147, no. 1, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 04020150.

D. Heckerman, "Bayesian Networks for Data Mining," Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–119, Mar. 1997.

V. K. Sharma, S. K. Sharma, and A. P. Singh, "Risk enablers modelling for infrastructure projects using Bayesian belief network," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 993–1010, Apr. 2022.

C. K. H. Hon, C. Sun, B. Xia, N. L. Jimmieson, K. A. Way, and P. P.-Y. Wu, "Applications of Bayesian approaches in construction management research: a systematic review," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2153–2182, May 2022.

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 6th ed. Newtown Square, PA, USA.: Project Management Institute, 2017.

S. Sohu, T. R. B. Md. Kassim, and O. S. Khan, "Critical Risk Factors influencing Time Schedule of Residential Projects in Pakistan," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12636–12639, Feb. 2024.

F. A. Soomro, M. J. Memon, A. F. Chandio, S. Sohu, and R. Soomro, "Causes of Time Overrun in Construction of Building Projects in Pakistan," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3762–3764, Feb. 2019.

R. Ruiz-Benítez, C. López, and J. C. Real, "The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 203, pp. 190–202, Sep. 2018.

M. Jahangoshai Rezaee, S. Yousefi, and R. K. Chakrabortty, "Analysing causal relationships between delay factors in construction projects: A case study of Iran," International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 412–444, Feb. 2021.

Y. Xu, H.-Y. Chong, and M. Chi, "Modelling the blockchain adoption barriers in the AEC industry," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 125–153, Feb. 2023.

A. Shrivas and H. K. Singla, "Analysis of interaction among the factors affecting delay in construction projects using interpretive structural modelling approach," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1455–1463, Jun. 2022.

G. J. Kikwasi, "Claims in construction projects: how causes are linked to effects?," Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1710–1724, Nov. 2023.

O. Daboun, N. I. Abidin, A. R. Khoso, Z.-S. Chen, A. M. Yusof, and M. J. Skibniewski, "Effect of Relationship Management on Construction Project Success Delivery," Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 372–397, Apr. 2023.

Z. Z. Wang and C. Chen, "Fuzzy comprehensive Bayesian network-based safety risk assessment for metro construction projects," Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 70, pp. 330–342, Nov. 2017.

"GeNIe. (4.0.2304.0)." BayesFusion, [Online]. Available: https://download.bayesfusion.com/files.html.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
S. Q. Van, V. Likhitruangsilp, and P. G. Ioannou, “Predicting the Time Impact and Identifying the Practical Responses to Claim Causes in Building Projects”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 27257–27265, Oct. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 107
PDF Downloads: 30

Metrics Information