Enhancing Voltage Stability under GCC Constraints with the AI-Driven Optimization of Distributed Generators

Authors

  • Nasyith Hananur Rohiem Electrical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Adi Soeprijanto Electrical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Mat Syai’in Department of Marine Electrical Engineering, Surabaya Shipbuilding State, Indonesia
Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 28063-28070 | October 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.12532

Abstract

This paper presents a novel, data-driven, multi-objective optimization framework that uses Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA), Adaptive GOA (AGOA), and Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) to manage the active and reactive power outputs of Distributed Generators (DGs) within the limits of the AI-modeled Generator Capability Curve (GCC). This improves the voltage profiles and reduces the voltage unbalance in the distribution systems. The proposed method entails two steps. First, the GCC is reconstructed using a Deep Learning (DL) model with 20 neurons and 16 hidden layers. This model is trained utilizing numerical data for 2.5 MW and 3.0 MW DGs and achieves a minimum Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 1×10⁻⁸. Second, the reconstructed GCC is integrated as a dynamic constraint in the optimization model to guide the DG dispatch. Three metaheuristic algorithms were applied to optimize the DG operation under unbalanced loading conditions at buses 10 and 15. AGOA had the best performance, reducing the voltage unbalance from 2.2129% to 1.4086% at bus 10 and from 2.0820% to 1.4295% at bus 15. AGOA also restored the voltage at bus 15 from 0.8698 p.u. to over 0.926 p.u. and achieved the lowest convergence fitness (<1.43). These results confirm AGOA's effectiveness in enhancing the voltage stability and phase balance, emphasizing the advantages of integrating DL-based GCC modeling with adaptive metaheuristic optimization for reliable and efficient DG operation.

Keywords:

improving voltage profiles, reducing voltage unbalance, deep learning, GCC, metaheuristic algorithms

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. S. Vijay, S. Doolla, and M. C. Chandorkar, "Unbalance mitigation strategies in microgrids," IET Power Electronics, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1687–1710, 2020.

S. A. Taher and M. H. Karimi, "Optimal reconfiguration and DG allocation in balanced and unbalanced distribution systems," Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 735–749, Sept. 2014.

M. R. Haddad and M. Y. Al-Suliman, "Voltage Profile Improvement Based on Optimal Allocation and Sizing Distributed Generation," in 2024 21st International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Erbil, Iraq, Apr. 2024, pp. 239–244.

N. H. Rohiem, A. Soeprijanto, and M. Syai’in, "Optimal Placement and Sizing of Multiple DGs in an Unbalanced Load Flow Using GOA Direct-ZBR and AGOA Direct-ZBR Methods to Determine The Lowest Active Power Loss Value," in 2023 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation, ICAMIMIA 2023, Lombok, Indonesia, 2023, pp. 324–329.

M. Salman, S. Hongsheng, M. A. Aman, and Y. Khan, "Enhancing Voltage Profile and Power Loss Reduction Considering Distributed Generation (DG) Resources," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 8864–8871, Aug. 2022.

H. Çimen and N. Çetinkaya, "Voltage sensitivity-based demand-side management to reduce voltage unbalance in islanded microgrids," IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 2367–2375, 2019.

C.-Y. Lee and M. Tuegeh, "Virtual Visualization of Generator Operation Condition through Generator Capability Curve," Energies, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 185.

M. Syai’in, K. L. Lian, and A. Soeprijanto, "Digital Generator Capability Curve for Improving Optimal Power Flow based on IPSO," International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 912–919, Apr. 2013.

A. Flores, R. Zárate-Miñano, and M. Carrión, "Capability Curve Modeling for Hydro-Power Generators in Optimal Power Flow Problems," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 24, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 16654.

M. Syai’in, A. Soeprijanto, I. M. Y. Negara, and M. Mahfud, "Incremental Particle Swarm Optimizer with local search for Optimal Power Flow Subjected to Digital GCC based on Neural Network," International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 242–252, 2012.

F. C. R. Coelho, W. Peres, Ivo. C. Silva Júnior, and B. H. Dias, "Empirical continuous metaheuristic for multiple distributed generation scheduling considering energy loss minimisation, voltage and unbalance regulatory limits," IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 14, no. 16, pp. 3301–3309, 2020.

M. Kazeminejad, M. Banejad, U. D. Annakkage, and N. Hosseinzadeh, "Load pattern-based voltage stability analysis in unbalanced distribution networks considering maximum penetration level of distributed generation," IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 2517–2525, 2020.

E. S. Ali, R. A. El-Sehiemy, A. A. A. El-Ela, S. Kamel, and B. Khan, "Optimal planning of uncertain renewable energy sources in unbalanced distribution systems by a multi-objective hybrid PSO–SCO algorithm," IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2111–2124, 2022.

Reliability Guideline: Power Plant Model Verification for Inverter-Based Resources. Atlanta, GA,, USA: NERC, 2018.

S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili, S. Mirjalili, and J. Song Dong, "Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm: Theory, Literature Review, and Application in Hand Posture Estimation," in Nature-Inspired Optimizers: Theories, Literature Reviews and Applications, S. Mirjalili, J. Song Dong, and A. Lewis, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 107–122.

A. Alhejji, M. Ebeed Hussein, S. Kamel, and S. Alyami, "Optimal Power Flow Solution With an Embedded Center-Node Unified Power Flow Controller Using an Adaptive Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 119020–119037, 2020.

X.-S. Yang, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms, 1st ed. London, UK: Elsevier, 2014.

Y. Meraihi, A. B. Gabis, S. Mirjalili, and A. Ramdane-Cherif, "Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm: Theory, Variants, and Applications," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 50001–50024, 2021.

S. Dhivya and R. Arul, "Improved Flower Pollination Algorithm-based Optimal Placement and Sizing of DG for Practical Indian 52 Bus System," in 2021 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS), Toronto, ON, Canada, Apr. 2021, pp. 1–5.

S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed. Melbourne, Australia: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

J. Grainger, Power system analysis, 1st ed. Singapore: McGraw Hill, 1999.

Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, "Deep learning," Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, May 2015.

S. Ali, S. Riaz, Safoora, X. Liu, and G. Wang, "A Levenberg–Marquardt Based Neural Network for Short-Term Load Forecasting," Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1783–1800, 2023.

72:1987 - Standar Tegangan untuk Jaringan Tegangan Rendah. Jakarta, Indonesia: Perusahaan Umum Listrik Negara (PLN), 1987.

N. H. Rohiem, A. Soeprijanto, and M. Syai’in, "Multi-Objective Optimization for DG Placement and Sizing in Unbalanced Distribution Networks," in 2024 7th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Sept. 2024, pp. 217–222.

T.-H. Chen and N.-C. Yang, "Three-phase power-flow by direct ZBR method for unbalanced radial distribution systems," IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 903–910, Oct. 2009.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
N. H. Rohiem, A. Soeprijanto, and M. Syai’in, “Enhancing Voltage Stability under GCC Constraints with the AI-Driven Optimization of Distributed Generators”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 28063–28070, Oct. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 6
PDF Downloads: 2

Metrics Information