A Hybrid NSGA-II and EAMR Approach for Dual-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Gearbox with Split Input Stage

Authors

  • Van Thanh Dinh East Asia University of Technology, Trinh Van Bo Street, Hanoi City 12000, Vietnam
  • Duc Binh Vu Viet Tri University of Industry, 09 Tien Son Street, Viet Tri City 35100, Vietnam
  • Manh Cuong Nguyen Thai Nguyen University of Technology, 3/2 street, Tich Luong Ward, Thai Nguyen City 251750, Vietnam
  • Thi Thu Huong Truong Thai Nguyen University of Technology, 3/2 street, Tich Luong Ward, Thai Nguyen City 251750, Vietnam
Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 26156-26162 | October 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11790

Abstract

This study proposes a hybrid Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) approach that integrates the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and the Evaluation by an Area-based Method of Ranking (EAMR) to optimize the design of a two-stage helical gearbox featuring a split input stage. The optimization simultaneously targets two conflicting objectives: minimizing the base area of the gearbox housing and maximizing the transmission efficiency. A parametric design model was developed to capture the key geometrical and performance parameters, while ensuring compliance with the practical constraints related to gear strength and manufacturing limitations. The NSGA-II algorithm was employed to generate a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which were subsequently ranked using the EAMR method to support decision-making. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the hybrid approach in identifying high-performance design alternatives that offer an optimal balance between compactness and efficiency. This is the first study to apply a combination of NSGA-II and a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method to the dual-objective optimization of a two-stage gearbox with a split input stage. In particular, the proposed approach successfully identifies the optimal design parameters across a wide range of transmission ratios, thereby facilitating the initial selection of appropriate gearbox transmission ratios in the early-stage design. This study also provides valuable design guidelines for engineers seeking to improve space utilization and performance in gear transmission systems.

Keywords:

two-stage gearbox, split input stage, NSGA-II, EAMR, multi-objective optimization, gear design, gearbox efficiency, base area minimization, helical gears, Pareto front

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Rosić, B. Rosić, and M. Sedak, "Multi-Objective Hybrid Sailfish Optimization Algorithm for Planetary Gearbox and Mechanical Engineering Design Optimization Problems," Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 2111–2145, 2025

A. Kumar, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-objective 3-stage wind turbine gearbox (WTG) with tribological constraint," Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 5263–5289, Aug. 2024.

X. Xu et al., "Optimization Design for the Planetary Gear Train of an Electric Vehicle under Uncertainties," Actuators, vol. 11, no. 2, Feb. 2022, Art. no. 49.

K. Deb and S. Jain, "Multi-Speed Gearbox Design Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 609–619, Sep. 2003.

M. Hu, J. Zhu, L. Gong, Z. Lu, and H. Liu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of an Aeroengine Accessory Gearbox Transmission Based on a Heuristic Algorithm," Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, Mar. 2025.

E. B. Younes, C. Changenet, J. Bruyère, E. Rigaud, and J. Perret-Liaudet, "Multi-objective optimization of gear unit design to improve efficiency and transmission error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 167, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104499.

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and S. Krishnapillai, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two Stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II," in SAE Technical Paper Series, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States, vol. 1, Jul. 2017, Art. no. 1939.

E. S. Maputi and R. Arora, "Multi-objective spur gear design using teaching learning-based optimization and decision-making techniques," Cogent Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2019.

Z. Qingyong et al., "Multi-objective Optimization Design and Dynamic Characteristic Analysis based on Planetary Gear Transmission," Journal of Network Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 639– 657 Aug. 2023.

J. H. Kim, B. S. Kim, D. Im, J. H. Park, D. J. Moon, and Y. J. Park, "Optimization of high-speed angular contact ball bearing for aircraft gearbox utilizing an evolutionary multi-objective algorithm, NSGA-III," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 9, Sep. 2024.

V. Savsani, R. V. Rao, and D. P. Vakharia, "Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 531–541, Mar. 2010.

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects," Journal of Friction and Wear, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 430–436, Nov. 2017.

M. Mendez, D. A. Rossit, B. Gonzalez, and M. Frutos, "Proposal and Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimum Design of a Gear System," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 3482–3497, 2020.

K. Daoudi, E. M. Boudi, and M. Abdellah, "Genetic Approach for Multiobjective Optimization of Epicyclical Gear Train," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2019, no. 1, Jan. 2019.

R. C. Sanghvi, A. S. Vashi, H. P. Patolia, and R. G. Jivani, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two-Stage Helical Gear Train Using NSGA-II," Journal of Optimization, vol. 2014, pp. 1–8, 2014.

T. Q. Hung, V. D. Binh, D. V. Thanh, L. A. Tung, and N. K. Tuan, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Two Gear Sets in First Stage to Reduce Volume and Enhance Efficiency using the EAMR Technique," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19288–19294, Feb. 2025.

L. D. Bao, V. D. Binh, D. V. Thanh, K. M. Nguyen, and L. X. Hung, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with Double Gears in the First Stage using MARCOS," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 18245–18251, Dec. 2024.

Q. Yao, "Multi-objective optimization design of spur gear based on NSGA-II and decision making," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2019.

T. Chat and L. Van Uyen, Design and Calculation of Mechanical Transmissions Systems. Hanoi, Vietnam: Educational Publishing House, 2007.

D. Jelaska, Gears and Gear Drives, 1st ed. Wiley, 2012.

X. H. Le and N. P. Vu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 7601.

M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, E. Zavadskas, M. Amiri, and J. Antucheviciene, "Evaluation by an Area-based Method of Ranking Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets (EAMRIT-2F) for Multi-criteria Group Decision-making," Transformations in Business and Economics, vol. 15, no. 3 (39), pp.76–95, Dec. 2016.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
V. T. Dinh, D. B. Vu, M. C. Nguyen, and T. T. H. Truong, “A Hybrid NSGA-II and EAMR Approach for Dual-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Gearbox with Split Input Stage”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 26156–26162, Oct. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 16
PDF Downloads: 7

Metrics Information