Optimal Design of a Two-Stage Helical Gear Reducer with Split Output Stage: A Multi-Objective Approach Based on NSGA-II and TOPSIS
Received: 21 April 2025 | Revised: 5 June 2025 | Accepted: 21 June 2025 | Online: 2 August 2025
Corresponding author: Thanh Tu Nguyen
Abstract
This study presents a novel approach for the optimal design of a two-stage helical gear reducer with a split output stage, to achieve a balance between the mechanical compactness and transmission performance. The optimization problem considers two conflicting objectives: minimizing the cross-sectional area of the gearbox structure and maximizing its mechanical efficiency. To solve this Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP), the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed, aiming to generate a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, capturing the trade-offs between the two design goals. Subsequently, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to rank and identify the most preferable solution among the Pareto front based on decision-makers' preferences. The proposed hybrid framework enables a systematic exploration of the design space, providing engineering insights into how the gear ratio distribution and geometric parameters influence the gearbox’s performance. The results demonstrate that the integration of NSGA-II and TOPSIS effectively supports the optimal design of compact and high-efficiency gear reducers with split-stage configurations.
Keywords:
two-stage helical gearbox, split output stage, multi-objective optimization, NSGA-II, TOPSIS, gear ratio distribution, cross-sectional area, efficiencyDownloads
References
A. Konak, D. W. Coit, and A. E. Smith, "Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 992–1007, Sep. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018
V. Savsani, R. V. Rao, and D. P. Vakharia, "Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 531–541, Mar. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.010
M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects," Journal of Friction and Wear, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 430–436, Nov. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068366617060101
H. Wang and H. P. Wang, "Optimal engineering design of spur gear sets," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1071–1080, Oct. 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(94)90074-4
M. Mendez, D. A. Rossit, B. Gonzalez, and M. Frutos, "Proposal and Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimum Design of a Gear System," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 3482–3497, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962906
R. C. Sanghvi, A. S. Vashi, H. P. Patolia, and R. G. Jivani, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two-Stage Helical Gear Train Using NSGA-II," Journal of Optimization, vol. 2014, pp. 1–8, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/670297
K. Daoudi, E. M. Boudi, and M. Abdellah, "Genetic Approach for Multiobjective Optimization of Epicyclical Gear Train," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2019, no. 1, Jan. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9324903
Y. Lei, L. Hou, Y. Fu, J. Hu, and W. Chen, "Research on vibration and noise reduction of electric bus gearbox based on multi-objective optimization," Applied Acoustics, vol. 158, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 107037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107037
M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and S. Krishnapillai, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two Stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II," in SAE Technical Paper Series, Warrendale, PA, United States, Jul. 2017, vol. 1, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-28-1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-28-1939
L. Qi, J. Zhou, and H. Xu, "Multi-objective optimization of gearbox based on panel acoustic participation and response surface methodology," Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1108–1130, Sep. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484221091075
E. S. Maputi and R. Arora, "Multi-objective optimization of a 2-stage spur gearbox using NSGA-II and decision-making methods," Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 9, Sep. 2020, Art. no. 477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02557-2
M. Hu, J. Zhu, L. Gong, Z. Lu, and H. Liu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of an Aeroengine Accessory Gearbox Transmission Based on a Heuristic Algorithm," Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, Mar. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-5155
E. B. Younes, C. Changenet, J. Bruyère, E. Rigaud, and J. Perret-Liaudet, "Multi-objective optimization of gear unit design to improve efficiency and transmission error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 167, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104499
K. Deb and S. Jain, "Multi-Speed Gearbox Design Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 609–619, Sep. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1596242
Q. Yao, "Multi-objective optimization design of spur gear based on NSGA-II and decision making," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018824936
D. Miler, D. Žeželj, A. Lončar, and K. Vučković, "Multi-objective spur gear pair optimization focused on volume and efficiency," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 125, pp. 185–195, Jul. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.03.012
R. Ananthapadmanabhan, S. A. Babu, K. Hareendranath, C. Krishnamohan, S. Krishnapillai, and K. A, "Investigation on Multiple Algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimization of Gear Box," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 149, Sep. 2016, Art. no. 012049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012049
M. Nasr, K. Maalawi, and K. Yihia, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Planetary Gear Train Using Genetic Algorithm," Journal of International Society for Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 74-80, Sep. 2022.
E. S. Maputi and R. Arora, "Multi-objective spur gear design using teaching learning-based optimization and decision-making techniques," Cogent Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2019, Art. no. 1665396, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1665396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1665396
J. J. Eckert, S. F. Da Silva, F. M. Santiciolli, Á. C. De Carvalho, and F. G. Dedini, "Multi-speed gearbox design and shifting control optimization to minimize fuel consumption, exhaust emissions and drivetrain mechanical losses," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 169, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 104644, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104644
M. Gobbi, G. Mastinu, and M. Caudano, "Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimisation of a Gearbox Synchroniser and Selector Mechanism, " in Design Engineering, Volumes 1 and 2, Washington, DC, USA, Jan. 2003, pp. 113–124, https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2003-43005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2003-43005
W. Xin, Y. Zhang, Y. Fu, W. Yang, and H. Zheng, "A multi-objective optimization design approach of large mining planetary gear reducer, " Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, Oct. 2023, Art. no. 18640, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45745-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45745-5
P. X. Yi, L. J. Dong, and Y. X. Chen, "The Multi-Objective Optimization of the Planet Carrier in Wind Turbine Gearbox," Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 184–185, pp. 565–569, Jun. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.184-185.565
H. D. Tran, V. T. Dinh, D.-B. Vu, D. Vu, A. T. Luu, and N. P. Vu, "Application of the TOPSIS Method for Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 15454–15463, Aug. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7551
L. D. Bao, V. D. Binh, D. V. Thanh, K. M. Nguyen, and L. X. Hung, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with Double Gears in the First Stage using MARCOS," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 18245–18251, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8865
C. T and U. L Van, Design and calculation of Mechanical Transmissions Systems, Educational Republishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007.
D. Jelaska, Gears and Gear Drives, 1st ed., New York, New York State: Wiley, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118392393
X. H. Le and N. P. Vu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 7601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137601
C. L. Hwang, Y. J. Lai, and T. Y. Liu, "A new approach for multiple objective decision making," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 889–899, Oct. 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Van Thanh Dinh, Duc Binh Vu, Thi Thu Huong Truong, Khac Minh Nguyen, Thanh Tu Nguyen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
