Finite Element Based Optimization of Two-Way Concrete Slabs: A Comparative Study on Embodied Carbon and Cost Efficiency

Authors

  • Militia Keintjem Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
  • Riza Suwondo Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
  • Made Suangga Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 25251-25256 | August 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11607

Abstract

The building sector is a major source of Global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. The carbon embodied in construction materials has drawn attention in sustainable design. Reinforced concrete slabs, as core structural elements, contribute notably to both environmental and economic impacts. This study examines the use of Finite Element Modeling (FEM) in the design of two-way concrete slabs. The goal is to reduce the embodied carbon and material cost compared to the conventional design methods. A concrete slab system was analysed under typical office building loads. A structural design was developed using FEM and compared to the Marcus method. This traditional approach relies on empirical moment coefficients and is widely used in Indonesian engineering practice. The results showed that FEM consistently required less reinforcement for all slab thicknesses studied. This reduction in material led to carbon savings of up to 12%. It also resulted in cost savings of up to 15% per m², especially for slabs 150–180 mm thick. While the difference between the methods decreased with thicker slabs, FEM remained more efficient in all cases. Overall, the findings show that FEM improves the structural precision. At the same time, it supports both the environmental and economic goals in slab design. Performance-based methods, like FEM, can help achieve low-carbon construction without compromising safety or code compliance.

Keywords:

low carbon structures, sustainable building, climate action, embodied carbon, sustainability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. De Wolf, F. Pomponi, and A. Moncaster, "Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice," Energy and Buildings, vol. 140, pp. 68–80, Apr. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075

2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‐Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector, 1st ed., UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 2022.

I. Sartori and A. G. Hestnes, "Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article," Energy and Buildings, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 249–257, Mar. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001

R. Giordano, V. Serra, E. Demaria, and A. Duzel, "Embodied Energy Versus Operational Energy in a Nearly Zero Energy Building Case Study," Energy Procedia, vol. 111, pp. 367–376, Mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.198

M. Hu and N. W. Esram, "The Status of Embodied Carbon in Building Practice and Research in the United States: A Systematic Investigation," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 12961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312961

M. Keintjem, R. Suwondo, L. Cunningham, and H. Razak, "Embodied Carbon in Concrete: Insights from Indonesia and Comparative Analysis with UK and USA," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 17737–17742, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8781

Buildings and Climate Change: Industry Call to Action, 1st ed., UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 2009.

World Green Building Council. "Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Spotlight on clean construction." https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront-spotlight-on-clean-construction/.

D. Khan, E. A. Khan, M. S. Tara, S. Shujaa, and S. Gardezi, "Embodied Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Conventional Commercial Building Using BIM," in Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology, Cham, 2021, pp. 247–250, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_41

M. Hellmeister, "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Embodied Carbon and Operational Energy of Different Building Systems," M.S. thesis, Forest Resources,University of Maine, Orono, USA, 2022.

S. Seo, A. Passer, J. Zelezna, and H. Birgisdottir, Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO₂eq for Building Construction (Annex 57), 1st ed. Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2016.

G. Hervé-Secourgeon et al., "On structural finite element modeling strategies and their influence on the optimization of final constructability of reinforced concrete structures," Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 385, Dec. 2021, Art. no. 111541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111541

SNI 1974:2011: Cara uji kuat tekan beton dengan benda uji silinder, BSN, 2011.

SNI 2052:2017: Baja tulangan beton, BSN, 2017.

SNI 1727:2020: Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain, BSN, 2020.

ETABS: Analysis, Design, and Building Systems, Computers and Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 2024.

SNI 2847:2019: Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan, BSN, 2019.

BS EN 15978:2011, Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method, London, UK: BSI, 2011.

O. P. Gibbon, J. J. Orr, C. Archer-Jones, and D. Green, How to calculate embodied carbon, 3rd ed. London, UK: The Institution of Structural Engineers, 2022.

"Embodied Carbon Footprint Database." Oct. 11, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html.

Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Umum, Indonesia: Ministry of Public Works and Housing, 2024.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
M. Keintjem, R. Suwondo, and M. Suangga, “Finite Element Based Optimization of Two-Way Concrete Slabs: A Comparative Study on Embodied Carbon and Cost Efficiency”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25251–25256, Aug. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 95
PDF Downloads: 199

Metrics Information