Finite Element Based Optimization of Two-Way Concrete Slabs: A Comparative Study on Embodied Carbon and Cost Efficiency
Received: 19 April 2025 | Revised: 2 June 2025 | Accepted: 14 June 2025 | Online: 2 August 2025
Corresponding author: Riza Suwondo
Abstract
The building sector is a major source of Global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. The carbon embodied in construction materials has drawn attention in sustainable design. Reinforced concrete slabs, as core structural elements, contribute notably to both environmental and economic impacts. This study examines the use of Finite Element Modeling (FEM) in the design of two-way concrete slabs. The goal is to reduce the embodied carbon and material cost compared to the conventional design methods. A concrete slab system was analysed under typical office building loads. A structural design was developed using FEM and compared to the Marcus method. This traditional approach relies on empirical moment coefficients and is widely used in Indonesian engineering practice. The results showed that FEM consistently required less reinforcement for all slab thicknesses studied. This reduction in material led to carbon savings of up to 12%. It also resulted in cost savings of up to 15% per m², especially for slabs 150–180 mm thick. While the difference between the methods decreased with thicker slabs, FEM remained more efficient in all cases. Overall, the findings show that FEM improves the structural precision. At the same time, it supports both the environmental and economic goals in slab design. Performance-based methods, like FEM, can help achieve low-carbon construction without compromising safety or code compliance.
Keywords:
low carbon structures, sustainable building, climate action, embodied carbon, sustainabilityDownloads
References
C. De Wolf, F. Pomponi, and A. Moncaster, "Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice," Energy and Buildings, vol. 140, pp. 68–80, Apr. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075
2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‐Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector, 1st ed., UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 2022.
I. Sartori and A. G. Hestnes, "Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article," Energy and Buildings, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 249–257, Mar. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001
R. Giordano, V. Serra, E. Demaria, and A. Duzel, "Embodied Energy Versus Operational Energy in a Nearly Zero Energy Building Case Study," Energy Procedia, vol. 111, pp. 367–376, Mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.198
M. Hu and N. W. Esram, "The Status of Embodied Carbon in Building Practice and Research in the United States: A Systematic Investigation," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 12961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312961
M. Keintjem, R. Suwondo, L. Cunningham, and H. Razak, "Embodied Carbon in Concrete: Insights from Indonesia and Comparative Analysis with UK and USA," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 17737–17742, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8781
Buildings and Climate Change: Industry Call to Action, 1st ed., UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 2009.
World Green Building Council. "Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Spotlight on clean construction." https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront-spotlight-on-clean-construction/.
D. Khan, E. A. Khan, M. S. Tara, S. Shujaa, and S. Gardezi, "Embodied Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Conventional Commercial Building Using BIM," in Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology, Cham, 2021, pp. 247–250, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_41
M. Hellmeister, "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Embodied Carbon and Operational Energy of Different Building Systems," M.S. thesis, Forest Resources,University of Maine, Orono, USA, 2022.
S. Seo, A. Passer, J. Zelezna, and H. Birgisdottir, Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO₂eq for Building Construction (Annex 57), 1st ed. Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2016.
G. Hervé-Secourgeon et al., "On structural finite element modeling strategies and their influence on the optimization of final constructability of reinforced concrete structures," Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 385, Dec. 2021, Art. no. 111541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111541
SNI 1974:2011: Cara uji kuat tekan beton dengan benda uji silinder, BSN, 2011.
SNI 2052:2017: Baja tulangan beton, BSN, 2017.
SNI 1727:2020: Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain, BSN, 2020.
ETABS: Analysis, Design, and Building Systems, Computers and Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 2024.
SNI 2847:2019: Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan, BSN, 2019.
BS EN 15978:2011, Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method, London, UK: BSI, 2011.
O. P. Gibbon, J. J. Orr, C. Archer-Jones, and D. Green, How to calculate embodied carbon, 3rd ed. London, UK: The Institution of Structural Engineers, 2022.
"Embodied Carbon Footprint Database." Oct. 11, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html.
Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Umum, Indonesia: Ministry of Public Works and Housing, 2024.
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Militia Keintjem, Riza Suwondo, Made Suangga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
