An Integrated NSGA-II and EAMR Approach for the Optimal Design of a Two-Stage Gear Transmission

Authors

  • Dinh Van Thanh East Asia University of Technology, Vietnam
  • Khac Minh Nguyen Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
  • Ngoc Pi Vu Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
  • Luu Anh Tung Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 25095-25101 | August 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11573

Abstract

This paper presents a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP) for the design of a two-stage gear reducer using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The optimization simultaneously targets the minimization of the gearbox volume and the maximization of the mechanical efficiency. Three key design variables are considered: the gear ratio of the high-speed stage (u1), the Face Width Coefficient (FWC) of the high-speed stage (Xba1), and that of the low-speed stage (Xba2). A physics-based model is developed to compute the gearbox volume and efficiency from these design parameters. NSGA-II was employed to generate Pareto-optimal solutions, and the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution Ranking (EAMR) method was deployed to identify the most balanced design for each transmission ratio (uh). The results showed that as uh increases from 5 to 35, the gearbox volume rises from 237.08 dm3 to 272.72 dm³, while the efficiency decreases from 95.84% to 90.82%. A strong linear relationship (R2 = 0.9941) between u1 and uₕ was discovered, enabling deriving a general design rule for the gear ratio allocation in preliminary gearbox design.

Keywords:

two-stage gearbox, multi-objective optimization, NSGA-II, gear ratio, face width coefficient, efficiency, volume, design trade-off

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Gologlu and M. Zeyveli, "A genetic approach to automate preliminary design of gear drives," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1043–1051, Oct. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.04.006

V. Savsani, R. V. Rao, and D. P. Vakharia, "Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 531–541, Mar. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.010

K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, Apr. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

A. Konak, D. W. Coit, and A. E. Smith, "Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 992–1007, Sep. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018

V.-T. Dinh et al., "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method," Processes, vol. 12, no. 6, Jun. 2024, Art. no. 1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061160

C. A. Coello Coello, D. A. Van Veldhuizen, and G. B. Lamont, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, New York, NY: Springer US, 2007.

M. Mendez, D. A. Rossit, B. Gonzalez, and M. Frutos, "Proposal and Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimum Design of a Gear System," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 3482–3497, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962906

T. H. Chong, "A design method of gear trains using a genetic algorithm," International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2000.

R. C. Sanghvi, A. S. Vashi, H. P. Patolia, and R. G. Jivani, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two-Stage Helical Gear Train Using NSGA-II," Journal of Optimization, vol. 2014, pp. 1–8, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/670297

K. Deb and S. Jain, "Multi-Speed Gearbox Design Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 609–619, Sep. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1596242

B. Varghese and P. Karande, "AHP-MARCOS, a hybrid model for selecting gears and cutting fluids," in Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 52, pp. 1397–1405, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.142

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and S. Krishnapillai, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two Stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II," in International Conference on Advances in Design, Materials, Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Mobility, Jul. 2017, pp. 2017-28–1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-28-1939

M. Hu, J. Zhu, L. Gong, Z. Lu, and H. Liu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of an Aeroengine Accessory Gearbox Transmission Based on a Heuristic Algorithm," Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, Mar. 2025, Art. no. 04024126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-5155

E. B. Younes, C. Changenet, J. Bruyère, E. Rigaud, and J. Perret-Liaudet, "Multi-objective optimization of gear unit design to improve efficiency and transmission error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 167, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104499

M. Gobbi, G. Mastinu, and M. Caudano, "Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimisation of a Gearbox Synchroniser and Selector Mechanism," in Design Engineering, Volumes 1 and 2, Washington, DC, USA, Jan. 2003, pp. 113–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2003-43005

D. Van Thanh et al., "Multi-objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear Sets to Decrease Gearbox Height and Increase Gearbox Efficiency," in Advances in Engineering Research and Application, vol. 944, D. C. Nguyen, D. T. Hai, N. P. Vu, B. T. Long, H. Puta, and K.-U. Sattler, Eds., Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 212–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62235-9_21

Q. Yao, "Multi-objective optimization design of spur gear based on NSGA-II and decision making," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2019, Art. no. 1687814018824936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018824936

J. Alam and S. Panda, "A comprehensive study on multi-objective design optimization of spur gear," Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 5272–5298, Sep. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2021.1996246

D. Miler, D. Žeželj, A. Lončar, and K. Vučković, "Multi-objective spur gear pair optimization focused on volume and efficiency," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 125, pp. 185–195, Jul. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.03.012

O. D. Mohammed, A. D. S. Bhat, and P. Falk, "Robust multi-objective optimization of gear microgeometry design," Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 119, Sep. 2022, Art. no. 102593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102593

Q. Zhang, S. Xu, Y. Yuan, X. Yan, D. Huang, and J. Yu, "Multi-objective optimization design and dynamic characteristic analysis based on planetary gear transmission," Journal of Network Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 639–657, Aug. 2023.

T. Chat and L. Van Uyen, Design and Calculation of Mechanical Transmissions Systems, 1 vols. Hanoi, Vietnam: Educational Republishing House, 2007.

L. D. Bao, V. D. Binh, D. V. Thanh, K. M. Nguyen, and L. X. Hung, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with Double Gears in the First Stage using MARCOS," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 18245–18251, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8865

D. Jelaska, Gears and gear drives, 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118392393

X.-H. Le and N.-P. Vu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 7601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137601

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
D. V. Thanh, K. M. Nguyen, N. P. Vu, and L. A. Tung, “An Integrated NSGA-II and EAMR Approach for the Optimal Design of a Two-Stage Gear Transmission”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25095–25101, Aug. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 98
PDF Downloads: 171

Metrics Information