Simulation-Based Allocation of the Inspection Stations in the Production Line for Production Cost Optimization
Received: 15 April 2025 | Revised: 30 May 2025 | Accepted: 6 June 2025 | Online: 2 August 2025
Corresponding author: Zainab Al-Baldawi
Abstract
Due to increasing competition, companies pursue achieving a maximum production rate with minimal defects in order to saving costs by minimizing the production costs while maintaining high product quality to stay competitive in the markets. The assurance of a high-quality product by inspection of conformity is an important issue. The inspection process plays a crucial role in detecting and eliminating the causes of defects at an early stage, reducing the percentage of defective products and minimizing production costs. In this paper, an allocating algorithm is proposed and a mathematical allocating model is developed to investigate and determine the optimal number and locations of inspection stations along the production line where the proposed model aims to balance the expected cost of defects with the cost of inspection stations to achieve minimum total cost. The proposed model was practically applied to a leather jacket production line. The final results show that two allocation solutions can be adopted. The first is the allocating solution of the proposed model that proposed 23 inspection stations, resulting saving cost 582,839 IQD while, the second solution is derived from the first solution that based on considering only inspection stations that achieve maximum saving cost so,7 inspection stations were allocated, achieving total saving cost of 552,545 IQD.
Keywords:
defect percentage, inspection stations, production line, production costDownloads
References
U. S. B. Rakiman and A. T. Bon, "Production Line: Effect of Different Inspection Station Allocation," Procedia Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 509–515, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.066
W. Grzechca, "Assembly Line Balancing Problem with Reduced Number of Workstations," IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 6180–6185, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02530
I. Schick, S. Gershwin, and J.-Y. Kim, “Quality / Quantity Modeling and Analysis of Production Lines Subject to Uncertainty," Final Report Presented to General Motors R & D Center, Jul. 12, 2025.
I. Memon, Q. Jamali, A. Jamali, M. Abbasi, N. Jamali, and H. Jamali, "Defect Reduction with the Use of Seven Quality Control Tools for Productivity Improvement at an Automobile Company," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, pp. 4044–4047, Apr. 2019, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2634
P. Korytkowski, T. Wiśniewski, and O. Zaikin, “Multi-criteria approach to comparison of inspection allocation for multi-product manufacturing systems in make-to-order sector,” Control And Cybernetics, vol. 39, pp. 97–116, Jan. 2010.
I. A. Memon, A. Ali, M. A. Memon, U. A. Rajput, S. a. K. Abro, and A. A. Memon, "Controlling the Defects of Paint Shop using Seven Quality Control Tools in an Automotive Factory," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 5062–5065, Dec. 2019, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3160
M.-A. Filz, C. Herrmann, and S. Thiede, "Simulation-based Assessment of Quality Inspection Strategies on Manufacturing Systems," Procedia CIRP, vol. 93, pp. 777–782, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.069
F. Z. Mhada, R. P. Malhamé, and R. Pellerin, "Joint assignment of buffer sizes and inspection points in unreliable transfer lines with scrapping of defective parts," Production & Manufacturing Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–101, Dec. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2013.857618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2013.857618
S. Mantri and S. Jaju, "Cost of quality management in indian industries: A practical insight," International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 11, pp. 491–506, Jan. 2017, https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR11.03-01.
Y. D. Regent Montororing and F. Nurprihatin, "Model of quality control station allocation with consider work in process, and defect probability of final product," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1811, no. 1, Nov. 2021, Art. no. 012013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012013
I. Tirkel and G. Rabinowitz, "Modeling cost benefit analysis of inspection in a production line," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 147, pp. 38–45, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.05.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.05.012
B. O. Odedairo and N. Nwabuokei, "Framework for Operational Performance Measurements in Small and Medium Scale Industries Using Discrete Event Simulation Approach," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 3103–3107, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2106
J. W. Gavett, Production and operations management. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.
O. Okerekehe, "The Impact of Inspection on the Quality Assurance and Reliability of Projects, Manufacturing, Operations and Maintenance," British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, vol. 4, pp. 3884–3901, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2014/12081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2014/12081
S. A. Kumar, Production and operations management: (with skill development, caselets and cases), 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers, 2008.
G. Giannakis, V. S. Kouikoglou, and S. Nikitas, "Workflow analysis of production lines with complete inspection and rework loops," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 24, pp. 7321–7336, Dec. 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903469050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903469050
P. Tsarouhas and G. Liberopoulos, "Determining quality inspection frequency in an automated production line based on field failure data analysis," Operational Research, vol. 4, pp. 305–315, Sep. 2004, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944148
F. Eger et al., "Zero Defect Manufacturing Strategies for Reduction of Scrap and Inspection Effort in Multi-stage Production Systems," Procedia CIRP, vol. 67, pp. 368–373, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.228
S. Gupta and M. Starr, Production and Operations Management Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b16470
Uday S. Karmarkar, "Production and Operations Management," vol. 21, no. 3, pp. xi–xiii, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01275.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01275.x
M. B. Ramzan and C. W. Kang, "Minimization of inspection cost by determining the optimal number of quality inspectors in the garment industry," Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research (IJFTR), vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 346–350, Sep. 2016, https://doi.org/10.56042/ijftr.v41i3.6321.
M. S. J. Hossain and B. R. Sarker, "Optimal locations of on-line and off-line rework stations in a serial production system," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3603–3621, Jun. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1117676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1117676
H. Maleki and A. Aghazadeh Shabestari, "A heuristic method against simulation for optimal allocation of inspection stations in manufacturing systems," SIMULATION, vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 1027–1040, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549717753293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549717753293
M. Ouzineb, F. Z. Mhada, R. Pellerin, and I. El Hallaoui, "Optimal planning of buffer sizes and inspection station positions," Production & Manufacturing Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 90–112, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1422812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1422812
Q. Li, "An Optimal Model for Quality Inspection Station Setting," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1865, Apr. 2021, Art. no. 032062,https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1865/3/032062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1865/3/032062
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zainab Al-Baldawi, Ayat Sabah, Sawsan Sabeeh A. Al-Zubaidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
