Optimized Deep Learning for Enhanced Trade-off in Differentially Private Learning


  • P. Geetha Department of CSE, Cambridge Institute of Technology, India
  • C. Naikodi Department of Studies and Research in Computer Science, Davangere University, India
  • L. Suresh Department of CSE, Cambridge Institute of Technology, India
Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 6745-6751 | February 2021 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4017


Privacy and data analytics are two conflicting domains that have gained interest due to the advancements of technology in the big data era. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce take advantage of the data collected, to help them enable innovative decision making and analysis. What is sidelined is the fact that the collected data have associated private data of the individuals involved, and may be exploited and used for unjustified purposes. Defending privacy and performing useful analytics are two sides of the same coin, and hence achieving a good balance between these is a challenging scenario. This paper proposes an optimized differentially private deep learning mechanism that enhances the trade-off between the conflicting objectives of privacy, accuracy, and performance. The goal of this paper is to provide an optimal solution that gives a quantifiable trade-off between these contradictory objectives.


privacy, optimization, pareto-optimal, analytics


Download data is not yet available.


L. Sweeney, "Achieving k-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression," International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 571-588, Oct. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021848850200165X

A. Machanavajjhala, D. Kifer, J. Gehrke, and M. Venkitasubramaniam, "L-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity," ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2007, Art. no. 3-es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1217299.1217302

C. Dwork and A. Roth, "The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy," Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 211-407, Aug. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042

I. Mironov, "Renyi Differential Privacy," in 2017 IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), Aug. 2017, pp. 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2017.11

"Google's Differential Privacy May be Better Than Apple's," The Mac Observer, Sep. 15, 2017. https://www.macobserver.com/analysis/

google-apple-differential-privacy/ (accessed Jan. 17, 2021).

M. Abadi et al., "Deep Learning with Differential Privacy," in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2016, pp. 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318

G. Naya, "Available hyperparameter optimization techniques," Medium, Jan. 08, 2020. https://towardsdatascience.com/available-hyperparameter-optimization-techniques-dc60fb836264 (accessed Jan. 17, 2021).

N. Gunantara, "A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications," Cogent Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1502242, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242

I. A. Kandhro, S. Z. Jumani, F. Ali, Z. U. Shaikh, M. A. Arain, and A. A. Shaikh, "Performance Analysis of Hyperparameters on a Sentiment Analysis Model," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 6016-6020, Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3549

V. Kumar and S. K. Dhull, "Genetic Algorithm based Optimization of Uniform Circular Array," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 6403-6409, Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3792

B. Avent, J. Gonzalez, T. Diethe, A. Paleyes, and B. Balle, "Automatic Discovery of Privacy-Utility Pareto Fronts," in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2020, Jul. 2020, vol. 4, pp. 5-23, Accessed: Jan. 17, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10862. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0060

R. Shokri and V. Shmatikov, "Privacy-preserving deep learning," in 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), Monticello, IL, USA, Sep. 2015, pp. 909-910. https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447103

"Google Just Open Sourced TensorFlow, Its Artificial Intelligence Engine | WIRED." https://www.wired.com/2015/11/google-open-sources-its-artificial-intelligence-engine/ (accessed Jan. 17, 2021).

D. Dua and C. Graff, UCI Machine Learning Repository. Irvine, CA, USA: University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, 2019.

R. Iyengar, J. P. Near, D. Song, O. Thakkar, A. Thakurta, and L. Wang, "Towards Practical Differentially Private Convex Optimization," in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA, May 2019, pp. 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2019.00001

T. Handhayani, J. Hendryli, and L. Hiryanto, "Comparison of shallow and deep learning models for classification of Lasem batik patterns," in 2017 1st International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS), Semarang, Indonesia, Nov. 2017, pp. 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICOS.2017.8276330


How to Cite

P. Geetha, C. Naikodi, and L. Suresh, “Optimized Deep Learning for Enhanced Trade-off in Differentially Private Learning”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 6745–6751, Feb. 2021.


Abstract Views: 316
PDF Downloads: 294

Metrics Information
Bookmark and Share