Influences of Project Management Capabilities on the Organizational Performance of the Saudi Construction Industry
This paper aims to study the relations between construction enterprises’ project management capabilities and organizational performance. A questionnaire survey was administered to 89 Saudi construction contracting organization administrative members. Data were obtained from 32 projects that were held during the last two years and were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). It was hypothesized in this study that a construction organizational performance is influenced by project management capabilities within the enterprise. A structural equation model was set up to measure the above two latent variables through their constituent variables. This study introduced a method to measure performance both in qualitative and quantitative terms. The strong path coefficients between the constructs of the model are an indication that after decades in pursuit of finding ways to improve the performance of construction organizations, subjective dimensions of performance have proven to be as effective as the traditional objective dimensions.
Keywords:balanced scorecard, performance, SEM
N. M. A. Abbas, “The Impact of construction contractsmodels on construction claims in the Saudi Arabia”, 14th. Annual ARCOM Conference, Reading, UK, September 9-11, 1998
A. Neely, B. Marr, G. Roos, S. Pike, O. Gupta, “Towards the Third Generation of Performance Measurement”, Controlling, Vol, 15, No. 3-4, pp. 129-136, 2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15358/0935-0381-2003-3-4-129
H. Yang, J. F. Yeung, A. P. Chan, Y. Chiang, D. W. Chan, “A critical review of performance measurement in construction”, Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 269-284, 2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961011078981
Z. Jin, F. Deng, H. Li, M. Skitmore, “Practical Framework for Measuring Performance of International Construction Firms”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 139, No. 9, pp. 1154-1167, 2013.
H. S. Robinson, P. M. Carrillo, C. J. Anumba, A. M. A-Ghassani, “Review and implementation of performance management models in construction engineering organizations”, Construction Innovation, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 203-217, 2005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170510815258
A. Jugmohun, “Factors that influence the effectiveness of performance management system adoption in organization”, Global Journal of Human Resources Management, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 51-66, 2018
J. Brathwaite, “A contemporary twist on capability enhancement: how strategic project management influences capabilities requirements relationship with strategic outcomes”, The Business and Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 574-591, 2018
C. Hendrickson, T. Au, Project Management for Construction, Prentice Hall, 1989
Project Management Institute, A Guide of Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), Project Management Institute, 2017
G. K. Kanji, A. Wong, “Quality culture in construction industry”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.133-140, 1998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412988758
J. M. Kamara, G. Augenbroe, C. J. Anumba, P. M. Carrillo, “Knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry”, Construction Innovation, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 53-67, 2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170210814685
A. Warszawski, “Strategic planning in construction companies”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 133-140, 1996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:2(133)
K. Ringen, J. Seegal, A. Englund, “Safety and health in the construction industry”, Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 16, pp. 165-188, 1995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.001121
J. Liebowitz, C. Y. Suen, “Developing knowledge management metrics for measuring intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 54-66, 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010324160
A. M. Schneiderman, “Why balanced scorecards fail?”, Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, Special Edition, pp. 6-11, 1999
R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business Review Press, 1996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165876
D. Amaratunga, D. Baldry, M. Sarshar, “Assessment of facilities management performance - what next?”, Facilities, Vol. 18, No. 1-2, pp. 66-75, 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770010312187
A. Robson, V. B. Prabhu, “What can we learn from leading service practitioners about business excellence?”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 249-261, 2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005610
S. McCabe, Benchmarking in Construction, Blackwell Science, 2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696057
S. C. Dunn, R. F. Seaker, M. A. Waller, “Latent variables in business logistics research: scale development and validation”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 145-172, 1994
J. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, 2010
How to Cite
MetricsAbstract Views: 407
PDF Downloads: 281
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.