Analysis of Retransmission Policies for Parallel Data Transmission

Authors

  • I. A. Halepoto Department of Computer Systems Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan
  • I. H. Sadhayo Department of Telecommunication Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan
  • M. S. Memon Department of Computer Systems Engineering,Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan
  • A. Manzoor Department of Information Technology, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan
  • S. Bhatti Department of Information Technology, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan

Abstract

Stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) is a transport layer protocol, which is efficient, reliable, and connection-oriented as compared to transmission control protocol (TCP) and user datagram protocol (UDP). Additionally, SCTP has more innovative features like multihoming, multistreaming and unordered delivery. With multihoming, SCTP establishes multiple paths between a sender and receiver. However, it only uses the primary path for data transmission and the secondary path (or paths) for fault tolerance. Concurrent multipath transfer extension of SCTP (CMT-SCTP) allows a sender to transmit data in parallel over multiple paths, which increases the overall transmission throughput. Parallel data transmission is beneficial for higher data rates. Parallel transmission or connection is also good in services such as video streaming where if one connection is occupied with errors the transmission continues on alternate links. With parallel transmission, the unordered data packets arrival is very common at receiver. The receiver has to wait until the missing data packets arrive, causing performance degradation while using CMT-SCTP. In order to reduce the transmission delay at the receiver, CMT-SCTP uses intelligent retransmission polices to immediately retransmit the missing packets. The retransmission policies used by CMT-SCTP are RTX-SSTHRESH, RTX-LOSSRATE and RTX-CWND. The main objective of this paper is the performance analysis of the retransmission policies. This paper evaluates RTX-SSTHRESH, RTX-LOSSRATE and RTX-CWND. Simulations are performed on the Network Simulator 2. In the simulations with various scenarios and parameters, it is observed that the RTX-LOSSRATE is a suitable policy.

Keywords:

CMT, CMT-SCTP, retransmission policies, SCTP, parallel transmission

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. R. Iyengar, P. D. Amer, R. Stewart, “Retransmission policies for concurrent multipath transfer using SCTP multihoming”, 12th IEEE International Conference on Networks, Singapore, Vol. 2, pp. 713-719, IEEE, 2004

J. R. Iyengar, P. D. Amer, R. Stewart, “Receive buffer blocking in concurrent multipath transfer”, In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM'05), St. Louis, USA, Vol. 1, p. 6, IEEE, 2005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577365

A. L. Caro, P. D. Amer, R. R. Stewart, “Retransmission schemes for end-to-end failover with transport layer multihoming”, In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM'04, Vol. 3, pp. 1341- 1347, IEEE, 2004

J. Liu, H. Zou, J. Dou, Y. Gao, “Reducing receive buffer blocking in concurrent multipath transfer”, In 4th IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems for Communications, Shanghai, China, pp. 367-371, IEEE, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSC.2008.85

P. Natarajan, N. Ekiz, P. D. Amer, R. Stewart, “Concurrent multipath transfer during path failure”, Computer Communications, Vol. 32, No. 15, pp. 1577-1587, 2009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2009.05.001

I. A. Halepoto, F. C. Lau, Z. Niu, Z, “Concurrent multipath transfer under delay-based dissimilarity using SCTP”, In IEEE Second International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management (ICCTIM), pp. 180-185, IEEE, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTIM.2015.7224614

I. A. Halepoto, Scheduling and flow control in CMT-SCTP, HKU Theses Online (HKUTO), 2014

P. Natarajan, J. R. Iyengar, P. D. Amer, R. Stewart, “Concurrent multipath transfer using transport layer multihoming: Performance under network failures”, in Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2006, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1-7, IEEE, 2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2006.302276

J. R. Iyengar, P. D. Amer, R. Stewart, “Concurrent multipath transfer using transport layer multihoming: performance under varying bandwidth proportions”, in IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2004, Monterey, USA, Vol. 1, pp. 238-244, IEEE, 2004

H. Shen, C. Wang, W. Ma, D. Zhang, “Research of the retransmission policy based on compound parameters in SCTP-CMT”, in 2nd International Conference on Information Technology and Electronic Commerce (ICITEC), Dalian, China, pp. 25-28, IEEE, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEC.2014.7105564

A. L. Caro Jr, P. D. Amer, R. R. Stewart, “Retransmission policies for multihomed transport protocols”, Computer Communications, Vol. 29, No.10, pp. 1798-1810, 2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2005.10.017

T. Yang, L. Pan, L. Jian, H. Hongcheng, W. Jun, “Reducing receive buffer blocking in CMT based on SCTP using retransmission policy”, in IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), Xi'an, China, pp. 122-125, IEEE, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6013676

Y. Cao, C. Xu, J. Guan, “A record-based retransmission policy on SCTP's Concurrent Multipath Transfer”, in 2011 International Conference on Advanced Intelligence and Awareness Internet (AIAI 2011), Shenzhen, China, pp. 67-71, IEEE, 2011

F. Siddiqui, S. Zeadally, “SCTP multihoming support for handoffs across heterogeneous networks”, in: 4th Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (CNSR 2006), Moncton, NB, Canada, IEEE, 2006

A. L. Caro Jr, J. R. Iyengar, P. D. Amer, G. J. Heinz, R. R. Stewart, “Using SCTP multihoming for fault tolerance and load balancing”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 32, No.3, p.23, 2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/571697.571712

A. L. Caro Jr, P. D. Amer, J. R. Iyengar, R. R. Stewart, “Retransmission policies with transport layer multihoming”, in: 11th IEEE International Conference on Networks, Sydney, Australia, pp. 255-260, IEEE, 2003

I. A. Halepoto, F. C. M. Lau, Z. Niu, “Scheduling over dissimilar paths using CMT-SCTP”, in: Seventh International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Sapporo, Japan, pp. 535-540 IEEE, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2015.7182601

N. H. Bhangwar, I. A. Halepoto, S. Khokhar, A. A. Laghari, “On routing protocols for high performance”, Studies in Informatics and Control, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 441-448, 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24846/v26i4y201708

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
I. A. Halepoto, I. H. Sadhayo, M. S. Memon, A. Manzoor, and S. Bhatti, “Analysis of Retransmission Policies for Parallel Data Transmission”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 3079–3083, Jun. 2018.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 451
PDF Downloads: 232

Metrics Information
Bookmark and Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)