A Strategy for Implementing Automated Surface-Level Pipeline Monitoring Systems Based on Machine Vision for Geohazard Assessment and Risk Management: A Case Study in Almaty

Authors

  • Aiaal Eginov Technical Department, Tolagai-2050 LLP, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Sardaana Eginova University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 26139-26147 | August 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11751

Abstract

Seismically active regions such as Almaty pose an increasing threat to urban gas pipeline infrastructure due to hazards including earthquakes, landslides, and erosion. To address these challenges, we propose an integrated machine vision framework combining YOLOv11 with Roboflow 3.0, embedded within a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment to enable real-time geohazard monitoring and risk assessment. The methodology leverages deep learning for image-based defect detection, complemented by GIS-driven geostatistical analysis for hazard prediction and spatial risk modeling. A pilot implementation in Almaty achieved 95% defect detection accuracy, 30% faster response times, and significant improvements in maintenance planning efficiency. These findings highlight the system’s scalability for deployment in other geohazard-prone regions and its potential integration into national infrastructure resilience and disaster mitigation strategies.

Keywords:

pipeline monitoring, machine vision, Geographic Information System (GIS)-based risk management, geohazard forecasting, defect detection, predictive analytics, critical infrastructure resilience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. A. Strokova and E. A. Teterin, "Identification and assessment of geohazards affecting pipelines and urban areas," IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 43, Sep. 2016, Art. no. 012051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/43/1/012051

J. Chen and C. Xu, "Geological Hazards and Risk Management," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 8, Apr. 2024, Art. no. 3286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083286

G. Kazbekova, A. Aben, A. Amanov, N. Zhunissov, and A. Abibullayeva, "Effectiveness of Machine Learning Methods in Determining Earthquake Probable Areas: Example of Kazakhstan," Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, pp. 62–77, Mar. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37943/21KUXZ6354

A. M. Al-Sabaeei, H. Alhussian, S. J. Abdulkadir, and A. Jagadeesh, "Prediction of oil and gas pipeline failures through machine learning approaches: A systematic review," Energy Reports, vol. 10, pp. 1313–1338, Nov. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.009

A. Eginov and S. A. Eginova, "Pipesdefectdetection: A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Real-Time Gas Pipeline Safety Monitoring and Defect Recognition." Elsevier BV, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5212613

Y. Lamaury, J. Jessin, C. Heinzlef, and D. Serre, "Operationalizing Urban Resilience to Floods in Island Territories—Application in Punaauia, French Polynesia," Water, vol. 13, no. 3, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030337

S. Li et al., "Quantifying the Geomorphological Susceptibility of the Piping Erosion in Loess Using LiDAR-Derived DEM and Machine Learning Methods," Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 22, Nov. 2024, Art. no. 4203, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224203

H. Wang et al., "Disaster effects of climate change in High Mountain Asia: State of art and scientific challenges," Advances in Climate Change Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 367–389, Jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2024.06.003

W. Zhang, B. Pradhan, B. Stuyts, and C. Xu, "Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical and geohazard investigations," Geological Journal, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 2187–2194, Jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4779

R. J. L. Taloma, F. Cuomo, D. Comminiello, and P. Pisani, "Machine learning for smart water distribution systems: exploring applications, challenges and future perspectives," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 4, Jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11093-7

Z. Ma and G. Mei, "Deep learning for geological hazards analysis: Data, models, applications, and opportunities," Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 223, Dec. 2021, Art. no. 103858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103858

H. Jing, L. Huang, H. Liu, W. Jiang, Q. Deng, and R. Niu, "A Proposal for Rapid Assessment of Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines After Earthquakes," Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 7, Mar. 2025, Art. no. 3595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073595

M. Jaboyedoff et al., "Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review," Natural Hazards, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 5–28, Mar. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2

R. Karamma, S. Badaruddin, M. R. Mustamin, and M. I. Mukrim, "Flood Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for the Sinjai and Tangka River Catchments in Indonesia using Hydraulic Modeling and Spatial Analysis," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 20623–20634, Apr. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9837

H. Wen, L. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Hu, and X. Huang, "A hybrid machine learning model for landslide-oriented risk assessment of long-distance pipelines," Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 342, Sep. 2023, Art no. 118177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118177

D. Lekkakis, M. D. Boone, E. Strassburger, Z. Li, and W. P. Duffy, "Geohazard assessment lifecycle for a natural gas pipeline project," IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 26, Sep. 2015, Art. no. 012050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/26/1/012050

B. He, M. Bai, H. Shi, X. Li, Y. Qi, and Y. Li, "Risk Assessment of Pipeline Engineering Geological Disaster Based on GIS and WOE-GA-BP Models," Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 21, Oct. 2021, Art. no. 9919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219919

F. Sun, A. M. Cruz, and L. M. Parra, "Development of a Natech Social Vulnerability Index: A Comprehensive Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for a Case Study in Colombia," IDRiM Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5595/001c.124779

Z. Sagintayev, S. Atanov, and A. Gafurov, "Overview of modelling techniques for Geo Hazard Risk Assessment," Central Asian Journal of Water Research vol. 3, no. 1, p. 35–42, 2017.

R. Liang et al., "Multimodal data fusion for geo-hazard prediction in underground mining operation," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 193, Jul. 2024, Art. no 110268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110268

V. Marinos, G. Stoumpos, and C. Papazachos, "Landslide Hazard and Risk Assessment for a Natural Gas Pipeline Project: The Case of the Trans Adriatic Pipeline, Albania Section," Geosciences, vol. 9, no. 2, Jan. 2019, Art. no. 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9020061

M. Nurtas, Z. Zhantaev, and A. Altaibek, "Earthquake time-series forecast in Kazakhstan territory: Forecasting accuracy with SARIMAX," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 231, pp. 353–358, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.216

W. Forstmeier, E. Wagenmakers, and T. H. Parker, "Detecting and avoiding likely false‐positive findings – a practical guide," Biological Reviews, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1941–1968, Nov. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12315

V. Marinos, G. Stoumpos, G. Papathanassiou, N. Grendas, D. Papouli, and C. Papazachos, "Landslide Geohazard for Pipelines of Natural Gas Transport," Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, vol. 50, no. 2, Jul. 2017, Art. no. 845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.11791

E. Bayramov, M. Buchroithner, and M. Kada, "Radar Remote Sensing to Supplement Pipeline Surveillance Programs through Measurements of Surface Deformations and Identification of Geohazard Risks," Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 23, Dec. 2020, Art. no. 3934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12233934

A. Shekargoftar, H. Taghaddos, A. Azodi, A. Nekouvaght Tak, and K. Ghorab, "An Integrated Framework for Operation and Maintenance of Gas Utility Pipeline Using BIM, GIS, and AR," Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 36, no. 3, Jun. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001722

J. Oswell and D. Dewar, "International perspective of pipeline geotechnical advances and current challenges (we are more fallible than we think we are)." in 6th International Pipeline Geotechnical Conference IPG 2023, Bogota D.C., Colombia, 2023, pp. 1-12.

H. Shin, K. Kim, and D. F. Kogler, "Scientific collaboration, research funding, and novelty in scientific knowledge," PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 7, Jul. 2022, Art. no. e0271678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271678

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
A. Eginov and S. Eginova, “A Strategy for Implementing Automated Surface-Level Pipeline Monitoring Systems Based on Machine Vision for Geohazard Assessment and Risk Management: A Case Study in Almaty”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 26139–26147, Aug. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 402
PDF Downloads: 476

Metrics Information