Effect of Standard No. 2800 Rules for Moment Resisting Frames on the Elastic and Inelastic Behavior of Dual Steel Systems

Authors

  • H. Veladi Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
  • H. Najafi Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2139-2146 | December 2017 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1040

Abstract

According to most valid Design Codes including the Iranian Seismic Design Code (Standard No. 2800), moment resisting frames in dual systems must have the ability of resisting the 25% of the total lateral load of the dual system independently. This study is conducted to investigate the implementation of this rule for dual steel structures with two types of steel braced frame. Also, its effect on the strength of the structure and the distribution of lateral load between the frames and the bracing system is evaluated. In order to investigate the effect of that rule, structural models with 5, 10 and 15 floors are modeled. Nonlinear static analysis is employed and results are discussed. Following the Standard No. 2008 seems to increase the structure’s lateral resistance and decrease the number of elements entered into the inelastic behavior stage. In general, the structure has a more desirable inelastic behavior.

Keywords:

dual system, moment resisting frame, bracing system, lateral resistance, non-linear analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Stafford Smith, A. Coull, Tall building structures: analysis and design, Wiley, 1991

A. S. Whittaker, C. M. Uang, V. V. Bertero, An Experimental Study of the Behavior of Dual Steel Systems, University of California, Berkeley, 1990

A. K. Jain, R. G. Redwood, F. Lu, “Seismic response of concentrically braced dual steel frames”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 672-687, 1993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/l93-084

F. A. Charney, V. V. Bertero, An Evaluation of the design and analytical seismic response of a seven-storey reinforced concrete frame-wall structure, University of California, Berkeley, 1982

F. R. Khan, J. A. Sbarounis, “Interaction of shear walls and frames”, ASCE. Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 10-15, 1964

A. C. Heidebrecht, B. Stafford Smith, “Approximate Analysis of Tall Wall-Frame Structure”, Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 1734-1744, 1973

B. S. Smith, M. Kuster, J. C. D. Hoenderkainp, “Generalized method for estimating drift in high-rise structures”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 110, No. 7, pp. 1549-1562, 1984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:7(1549)

M. J. Nollet, B. S. Smith, “Stiffened-storey wall-frame tall building structure”, Computers & Structures, Vol. 66, No. 2-3, pp. 225-240, 1998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00064-3

J. Lee, M. Bang, J. Y. Kim, “An analytical model for high-rise wall-frame structures with outriggers”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Building, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 839-851, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.406

H. Tekeli, E. Atimtay, M. Turkmen, “A Simplified method for determining sway in reinforced concrete dual buildings and design applications”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 22, No. 15, pp. 1156–1172, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.761

L. J. Aukeman, P. Laursen, “Evaluation of the ASCE7-05 standard for dual systems: response historey analysis of a tall buckling-restrained braced frame dual systems”, Structure Congress, pp. 2707-2717, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41171(401)236

A. Mehdipanah, S. R. Mirghaderi, S. A. Razavi, “Evaluation of seismic behavior of buckling restrained braced frames as dual system in combination with special moment restring frames”, 15th World Conferences on Earthquake Engineering, 2012

A. Mehdipanah, S. R. Mirghaderi, S. A. Razavi, “Seismic performance of stiffness-based designed buckling-restrained braced frame and special moment-resisting frame dual systems”, Structure and Infastructure Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 918-935, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1071854

American Society of Civil Elilgineers, ASCE7-05, Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures, ASCE, 2005

Permanent Committee of Revising the Code of Practice for Seismic resistant Design of Buildings, Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of building (Standard No. 2800), 3rd edition, Building & Housing Research Center, 2007

American Institute of Steel Construction, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings: Allowable Stress Design and Plastic Design, AISC, 1989

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, ASCE, 2000

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
H. Veladi and H. Najafi, “Effect of Standard No. 2800 Rules for Moment Resisting Frames on the Elastic and Inelastic Behavior of Dual Steel Systems”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2139–2146, Dec. 2017.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 481
PDF Downloads: 222

Metrics Information
Bookmark and Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)