State of Quality Engineering Practices: The Pakistan Perspective


  • M. N. A. Khan Independent Researcher, Pakistan
  • A. M. Mirza Department of Computer Science, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Pakistan
  • M. Shahid University of Management and Technology, Pakistan
  • R. A. Wagan Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Pakistan
  • I. Saleem University of Management and Technology, Pakistan
Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 6309-6315 | October 2020 |


This study analyzes the state of quality engineering practices being exercised in the software industry of Pakistan. Statistics have been collected and analyzed to access important aspects of quality engineering including quality policy, review mechanism, quality assurance activities and practices, quality standards and models, and quality management systems. For this purpose, an elaborated questionnaire was prepared to pertain to various aspects of quality management and more than 30 software houses and software development organizations were surveyed in Islamabad and Rawalpindi. The survey results and a description of the concluding remarks are reported in this paper.


quality assurance, software testing, software quality models, software quality engineering, quality management system


Download data is not yet available.


C. Yue, "A projection-based approach to software quality evaluation from the users' perspectives," International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2341-2353, Sep. 2019. DOI:

S. Yadav and B. Kishan, "Analysis and Assessment of Existing Software Quality Models to Predict the Reliability of Component-Based Software," International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2824-2840, Jun. 2020. DOI:

N. Fenton and J. Bieman, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014. DOI:

S. H. Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering, 2nd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2002.

A. M. Davis, "Achieving Quality In Software Requirements," Software Quality Professional, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 37-44, Jun. 1999.

B. Kitchenham and S. L. Pfleeger, "Software quality: the elusive target [special issues section]," IEEE Software, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 12-21, Jan. 1996. DOI:

"Pakistan Software Export Board," Pakistan Software Export Board. (accessed Sep. 19, 2020).

"Pakistan Software Houses Association for IT & ITeS," P@SHA. (accessed Sep. 19, 2020).

C. J. Davis, A. Gillies, P. Smith, and J. B. Thompson, "Current practice in software quality and the impact of certification schemes | Request PDF," Software Quality Control, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145-161, Sep. 1993. DOI:

T. Hall, "What do developers really think about software quality?," in Software Quality Management III Vol 1 Quality Management, vol. 13, C. A. Brebbia and G. Staples, Eds. WIT Press, 1995, pp. 359-368.

H. W. Jung, S. G. Kim, and C. S. Chung, "Measuring software product quality: a survey of ISO/IEC 9126," IEEE Software, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 88-92, Sep. 2004. DOI:

S. P. Ng, T. Murnane, K. Reed, D. Grant, and T. Y. Chen, "A preliminary survey on software testing practices in Australia," in 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings., Apr. 2004, pp. 116-125.

R. Berntsson Svensson, T. Gorschek, and B. Regnell, "Quality Requirements in Practice: An Interview Study in Requirements Engineering for Embedded Systems," in Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, 2009, pp. 218-232. DOI:

V. Garousi and T. Varma, "A replicated survey of software testing practices in the Canadian province of Alberta: What has changed from 2004 to 2009?," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 2251-2262, Nov. 2010. DOI:

R. S. de Espindola, E. M. Luciano, and J. L. N. Audy, "An Overview of the Adoption of IT Governance Models and Software Process Quality Instruments at Brazil - Preliminary Results of a Survey," in 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, Jan. 2009, pp. 1-9.

F. Deissenboeck, E. Juergens, K. Lochmann, and S. Wagner, "Software quality models: Purposes, usage scenarios and requirements," in 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Quality, Vancouver, BC, USA, May 2009, pp. 9-14. DOI:

A. Imam, S. A. Khoja, and I. Shariff, Improving Software Quality: a Benchmarking Approach. CSREA Press, 2007.

M. Huo, J. Verner, L. Zhu, and M. A. Babar, "Software quality and agile methods," in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2004. COMPSAC 2004., Hong Kong, China, Sep. 2004, pp. 520-525 vol.1.

Y. Dubinsky and O. Hazzan, "Improvement of software quality: Introducing extreme programming into a project-based course," presented at the 14th International Conference of the Israel Society for Quality, 2002.

P. B. Crosby, Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain: How to Manage Quality - So That It Becomes A Source of Profit for Your Business, 1st ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1979.

D. Ince, Iso 9001 and Software Quality Assurance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

A. Gillies, Software Quality: Theory and Management. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1992.

P. Jain, A. Sharma, and L. Ahuja, "A Customized Quality Model for Software Quality Assurance in Agile Environment," International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE), vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 64-77, Jul. 2019. DOI:

M. N. A. Khan, A. M. Mirza, and I. Saleem, "Software Risk Analysis with the use of Classification Techniques: A Review," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 5678-5682, Jun. 2020. DOI:

A. Chenarani and E. A. Druzhinin, "A Quantitative Measure For Evaluating Project Uncertainty Under Variation And Risk Effects," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2083-2088, Oct. 2017. DOI:


How to Cite

M. N. A. Khan, A. M. Mirza, M. Shahid, R. A. Wagan, and I. Saleem, “State of Quality Engineering Practices: The Pakistan Perspective”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 6309–6315, Oct. 2020.


Abstract Views: 400
PDF Downloads: 263

Metrics Information
Bookmark and Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)